🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest is no longer a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or deny as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would determine the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with possible prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already undermined this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement sweeping additional powers, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and undue limitations" on civil liberties. Taken together, these incremental assaults on freedom have effectively eliminated the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Rationalize Crackdown

The most recent limitations are being defended by citing last week's heinous antisemitic assault on a Manchester mosque. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the safety of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a justification to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you can't draw the line at mass killing, you probably cannot establish limits at democratic principles," observed a prominent American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were fighting for the rights of minorities.

Present Situation

In today's complex situation, here's what's truly happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have characterized as systematic destruction. Its warfare have prompted the global justice body to issue arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and approve the detention of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to suppress a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems involved in this effort. Government officials have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to continue.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to take action.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish heritage with the actions of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also harmful. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly challenged for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a situation where police authorities can suggest that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have stated that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "complicit" in supposed mistreatment faced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed many thousands of lives. British politicians and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest expressions of discrimination in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for carrying placards opposing mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; including a retired priest and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "connected to" other nations, while the sitting leader described such protests as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to suppress dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, endured hardship and died to establish our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how casually we allowed them to be eroded.